The effect of catalyst composition and surface properties on the selective catalytic dehydrogenation of bioethanol Scientific paper

Main Article Content

Gunel Ramiz Azimova
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-2187
Selime Mammadova
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-6517
Turana Allaz Babayeva
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4993-4314
Konul Shirvan Alakbarova
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6329-4195
Vilayet Sabir Mammadov
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7816-5778
Tianjin Li
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-5901
Elmir Magsad Babayev
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-3111

Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis of bioethanol dehydro­genation using Cr–Cu–O and Ce–Cu–O catalyst systems. For the Cr–Cu–O cat­alysts, bioethanol is converted into a range of products including acetaldehyde, acetone and ethylene. Advanced characterization revealed that these catalysts are structurally complex, containing not only individual copper and chromium oxides but also a distinct compound, Cu2CrO4. A key finding is the clear struc­ture–property relationship: the catalyst’s crystallinity, which varied widely from 41.9 (mostly amorphous) to 73.8 % (highly crystalline), has a major effect on its catalytic activity. The Ce–Cu–O system converted bioethanol into a diverse mix­ture of products such as acetaldehyde, acetone and ethyl acetate, indicating the occurrence of multiple simultaneous reactions, including dehydrogenation and condensation. Most compositions resulted in separate CeO2 and CuO phases; however, a specific Ce:Cu ratio of 1:9 is unique. At this ratio, the material is reduced to form CeO2 with elemental copper, rather than CuO, and its crystal­linity increased from 52.7 to 71.2 %. The research showed that structural order is crucial for steering the reaction pathway, as only catalysts with low crystal­linity produce ethyl acetate. Furthermore, while the specific surface area of a catalyst (5.0 to 17.0 m2/g in this study) is a key factor in surface-driven reactions such as dehydrogenation, it does not affect all products equally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
G. R. Azimova, “The effect of catalyst composition and surface properties on the selective catalytic dehydrogenation of bioethanol: Scientific paper”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., vol. 91, no. 7-8, pp. 721–736, Aug. 2026.
Section
Physical Chemistry

References

M. A. K. Joyia, M. Ahmad, Y. F. Chen, M. Mustaqeem, A. Ali, A. Abbas, M. A. Gondal, Energy Convers. Manage. 321 (2024) 119037 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119037)

S. Jain, S. Kumar, Energy 296 (2024) 131130 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131130)

A. S. Dibazar, A. Aliasghar, A. Behzadnezhad, A. Shakiba, M. Pazoki, Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 14 (2024) 20679 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04288-5)

K. Mihajlovski, M. Milić, D. Pecarski, S. Dimitrijević-Branković, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 86 (2021) 651 (https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC210308032M)

M. H. Morad, Arab. J. Chem. 17 (2024) 105560 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105560)

E. S. Mamedov, B. A. Babaeva, S. E. Mamedov, N. F. Akhmedova, F. S. Kerimli, Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 77 (2022) 222 (https://doi.org/10.3103/S002713142204006X)

I. M. S. Anekwe, B. Oboirien, Y. M. Isa, Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. 18 (2024) 686 (https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2536)

B. Thangaraj, W. Monama, E. Mohiuddin, M. M. Mdleleni, Bioresour. Technol. 409 (2024) 131230 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131230)

R. Lei, Z. Chen, Q. Xu, N. Wang, Y. Qin, T. Wang, X. Lin, X. Qiu, Green Chem. 27 (2025) 9643 (https://doi.org/10.1039/D5GC02486B)

G. Busca, E. Spennati, P. Riani, T. K. Phung, G. Garbarino, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 13 (2025) 119648 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.119648)

S. Liu, Y. Meng, C. Luo, H. Zhu, Y. Song, H. Zhang, T. Wu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 86 (2024) 1414 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.413)

P. G. Choi, T. Ohno, T. Masui, N. Imanaka, J. Environ. Sci. 36 (2015) 63 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.017)

D. Yu, W. Dai, G. Wu, N. Guan, L. Li, Chin. J. Catal. 40 (2019) 1375 (https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63378-4)

C. Autthanit, W. Chatkaew, P. Praserthdam, B. Jongsomjit, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 103547 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103547)

W. Tian, B. Jongsomjit, D. Pjontek, J. E. Herrera, Mol Catal. 483 (2020) 110717 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2019.110717)

A. Singh, G. P. Rangaiah, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56 (2017) 5147 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00273)

F. Fang, Y. Guo, Chin. J. Catal. 39 (2018) 566 (https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(17)62996-6)

P. H. Finger, T. A. Osmari, M. S. Costa, J. M. C. Bueno, J. M. R. Gallo, Appl. Catal., A 589 (2020) 117236 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2019.117236)

S. H. Mammadova, K. X. Aghayeva, Chem. Prob. 18 (2020) 199 (https://chemprob.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/199-206.pdf)

A. Makoye, A. Vikar, A. B. Nacsa, R. Barthos, J. Valyon, F. Lónyi, T. Nagy, Catalysts 15 (2025) 709 (https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15080709)

M. Ngcobo, P. R. Makgwane, M. K. Mathe, Appl. Catal. Open 193 (2024)193 206976 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcato.2024.206976)

S. Said, M. Riad, J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 205 (2025) 112789 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2025.112789)

C. Tian, Y. Yue, C. Miao, W. Hua, Z. Gao, Catalysts 14 (2024) 541 (https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14080541)

Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Guan, H. Li, X. Nie, Y. Liang, X. Bao, X. Li, F. Wang, J. Catal. 426 (2023) 86 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2023.06.030)

Y. A. Fionov, S. G. Chuklina, K. S. Khlusova, A. V. Fionov, A. I. Zhukova, Magn. Reson. Chem. 61 (2023) 427 (https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.5353)

C. K. F. Monguen, S. Daniel, Z. Y. Tian, Chem. Eng. J. 474 (2023) 145769 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.145769)

S. Preedavijitkul, C. Autthanit, S. Jadsadajerm, C. Sricharoen, P. Praserthdam, B. Jongsomjit, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 147 (2023) 104895 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104895).