Enhancement and assessment of students systems thinking skills by application of systemic synthesis questions in the organic chemistry course

Main Article Content

Tamara N. Hrin
Dušica D. Milenković
Mirjana D. Segedinac
Saša Horvat

Abstract

Many studies in the field of science education have emphasized the fact that systems thinking is a very important higher-order thinking skill that should be fostered during classes. However, more attention has been dedicated to the different ways of the assessment of systems thinking skills, and less to their enhancement. Taking this into consideration, the goal of this study was not only to validate the systems thinking skills of secondary school students, but also to help students in the complex process of their development. With this goal, new instructional and assessment tools – systemic synthesis questions [SSynQs], were constructed, and an experiment with one experimental (E) and one control (C) group was conducted during organic chemistry classes. Namely, the instructional teaching/learning method for both E and C groups was the same in processing new contents, but different on classes for the revision of the selected organic chemistry contents. The results showed that students exposed to the new instructional method (E group) achieved higher performance scores on three different types of systems thinking than students from the C group, who were taught by the traditional method. The greatest difference between the groups was found in the most complex dimension of systems thinking construct – in the II level of procedural systems thinking. Along with this dimension, structural systems thinking and the I level of the procedural systems thinking were also observed. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
T. N. Hrin, D. D. Milenković, M. D. Segedinac, and S. Horvat, “Enhancement and assessment of students systems thinking skills by application of systemic synthesis questions in the organic chemistry course”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 1455–1471, Dec. 2016.
Section
History of & Education in Chemistry

References

S. Avargil, O. Herscovitz, Y. J. Dori, J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 21 (2012) 207

M. Barak, D. Ben-Chaim, U. Zoller, Res. Sci. Educ. 37 (2007) 353

Y. J. Dori, R. T. Tal, M. Tsaushu, Sci. Educ. 87 (2003) 767

G. Tsaparlis, U. Zoller, Univ. Chem. Educ. 7 (2003) 50

U. Zoller, J. Chem. Educ. 70 (1993) 195

L. B. Resnick, Education and Learning to Think, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1987, p. 2

C. Nakiboğlu, H. E. Yildirir, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 9 (2011) 1047

D. F. Salisbury, Five Technologies for Educational Change: Systems Thinking, Systems Design, Quality Science, Change Management, Industrial Technology, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996, p. 17

M. Evagorou, K. Korfiatis, C. Nicolaou, C. Constantinou, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 31 (2009) 655

O. B. Z. Assaraf, N. Orion, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 42 (2005) 518

S. A. Yoon, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 30 (2008) 1

O. B. Z. Assaraf, N. Orion, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47 (2010) 540

S. A. Gulyaev, H. R. Stonyer, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 24 (2002) 753

W. Riess, C. Mischo, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 32 (2010) 705

C. Sommer, M. Lücken, Nor. Stud. Sci. Educ. 6 (2010) 125

W. Hung, Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 39 (2008) 1099

K. Brandstädter, U. Harms, J. Groβschedl, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 34 (2012) 2147

J. T. Dauer, J. L. Momsen, E. Bray Speth, S. C. Makohon-Moore, T. M. Long, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 50 (2013) 639

T. Vachliotis, K. Salta, C. Tzougraki, Res. Sci. Educ. 44 (2014) 239

A. F. M. Fahmy, J. J. Lagowski, Afr. J. Chem. Educ. 2 (2012) 66

A. F. M. Fahmy, J. J. Lagowski, Afr. J. Chem. Educ. 4 (2014) 35

A. F. M. Fahmy, J. J. Lagowski, Pure Appl. Chem. 71 (1999) 859

A. F. M. Fahmy, J. J. Lagowski, J. Chem. Educ. 80 (2003) 1078

T. Vachliotis, K. Salta, P. Vasiliou, C. Tzougraki, J. Chem. Educ. 88 (2011) 337

J. D. Novak, D. B. Gowin, G. T. Johansen, Sci. Educ. 67 (1983) 625

T. Hrin, D. Milenković, M. Segedinac, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 14 (2016) 805

T. Hrin, A. F. M. Fahmy, M. Segedinac, D. Milenković, Res. Sci. Educ. 46 (2016) 525

S. Y. Kwon, L. Cifuentes, Educ. Technol. Soc. 10 (2007) 269

J. V. Powell, U. G. Aeby, T. Carpenter-Aeby, Comput. Educ. 40 (2003) 183

G. H. Bracht, G. V. Glass, Am. Educ. Res. J. 5 (1968) 437

S. R. G. Jones, Am. J. Sociol. 98 (1992) 451

H. Özmen, G. Demircioğlu, R. K. Coll, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 7 (2009) 1

E. Lopez, J. Kim, K. Nandagopal, N. Cardin, R. J. Shavelson, J. H. Penn, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 12 (2011) 131

D. S. Dunn, Statistics and Data Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001, p. 205

B. G. Tabachnick, L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics, Pearson Education, Boston, MA, 1996, p. 607

G. W., Corder, D. I. Foreman, Nonparametric Statistics for Non-statisticians: A Step-by-

-Step Approach, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2009, p. 57

C. O. Fritz, P. E. Morris, J. J. Richler, J. Exp. Psychol. 141 (2012) 2

J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New York, 1988, p. 75

J. J. G. Van Merriënboer, J. Sweller, Educ. Psychol. Rev. 17 (2005) 147

L. Mihalca, C. Mengelkamp, W. Schnotz, F. Paas, Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 41 (2015) 157

J. J. G. Van Merriënboer, P. A. Kirschner, L. Kester, Educ. Psychol. 38 (2003) 5.